An energy industry representative says over-regulating methane emissions could discourage the use of environment-friendly natural gas, but a former Colorado air quality official says cutting methane is a cost-effective way to fight the purported effects of man-induced climate change. The Environmental Protection Agency heard radically different views yesterday as it opened public hearings in Denver on its proposal to slash methane emissions from oil and gas production. Kathleen Sgamma of the Western Energy Alliance says critics exaggerate the energy industry’s pollution and the damage methane can do compared with carbon dioxide. John Lowey, a former member of the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission, says methane is a far more powerful greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. He says cutting methane would also reduce emissions of chemicals that cause ozone. Science has yet to prove man-made climate change theories, while history has shown several warming and cooling trends, despite carbon dioxide levels. Hearings were also held in Dallas.
Hearings Held in Denver Over Methane Emissions
This entry was posted in News and tagged carbon dioxide, colorado, Colorado Air Quality Control Commission, Dallas, Denver, energy industry, environment-friendly natural gas, Environmental Protection Agency, greenhouse-gas, John Lowey, Kathleen Sgamma, methane emissions, oil and gas, ozone, pollution, public hearings, purported effects, Western Energy Alliance. Bookmark the permalink.